
I was intrigued by the sign by the land transformed from an oil storage depot to a town park. What exactly did they mean that the place was “age friendly,” an ambitious goal for a recreational site? How might one park serve everyone from baby to elder and those with mobility challenges? And were they able to demonstrate rather than just tout the designation? To my deep delight they truly delivered on this public space by the river.
Years ago I spent time on Portland, Oregon’ Planning Commission and as its member on the city Design Commission. While neither a professional planner nor an architect, I learned much about what goes into designing a project. When I began to reflect on this new park in Connecticut, it was through the experience of that learning base.
The reclaimed land was basically an enormous clean slate and I imagine a welcome challenge to its architects. The team wisely assessed all the needs of many different citizens and ended up creating a series of “rooms’ within the expanse. And as new demands arose, the park has been modified.
In following posts I will lay out the clever way they truly met the claim to be “age friendly” as well as boat, dog, soccer, lacrosse, baseball, volleyball, kite flying, ice skating and lately pickleball accommodating. To say nothing of creating a lovely backdrop for weddings.
Age friendly sounds good. It will be interesting to read your posts about it . Thank you
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. Since I have aged I appreciate the consideration in public spaces.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very interesting
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love what they have accomplished.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds interesting and well worthwhile!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes indeed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Elizabeth, it sounds like a great achievement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have been very impressed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I haven’t seen that sign! Great idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I only ever saw it here. I wonder if it is a national designation.
LikeLike
Sounds like a great concept. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much better than the abandoned spot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So glad to know that all of you resigning there would be able to enjoy the place🥰
LikeLike
Yes. All sorts of people share the space.
LikeLike
Sounds good, Elizabeth
LikeLike
Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😊
LikeLike
I think this is great! Just as areas should provide access to the disabled, we should also take care of our older population.
LikeLike
Absolutely, especially since now I am them!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love how councils do this today, including access for all ages is so very important for community cohesion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely, especially with so many housing places just for elders, separating them from younger people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I agree that is a concern, it’s the same here in Australia Elizabeth.
LikeLike
I didn’t realize that the age segregation was there too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, unfortunately, it’s dressed up as over 55’s ‘retirement living’…
LikeLike
I would so miss the sounds of kids walking by our house.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I agree Elizabeth, while it can get a bit noisey around here at times with the families who now have teens (their music).
I do prefer the sound & vibrancy of all ages around me 😊
My friend lives in an over 55’s village & said at first she loved it with all the social activites. But then her neighbours started passing away & having to enter Aged care facilities & now realises she made the wrong choice.
LikeLike
This was very interesting. I look forward to your next post.
LikeLike
Public spaces intrigue me, especially those that work.
LikeLiked by 1 person