
The town had a vision as depicted in the schematic above, but there was a major problem. To quote the federal Environmental Protection Agency in their discussion of the area:
This brownfield site borders the scenic Connecticut River, making it a potentially valuable public asset if it could be remediated to stringent state standards. However, changing public perception was key. To be accepted as the location of a proposed Community Center and Riverfront Park site, the public had to change its opinion of the site from a contaminated liability, to a location safe for recreational activities.
I am distressed to read that the main objective seemed to be “changing public perception.” I find the government phrasing a little manipulative to say the least. I would have much preferred the straightforward statement that “we will make this area safe for recreation.” Nonetheless, money was provided by the federal government to clean up the site.
Much contaminated soil was buried, much was removed, and protections were put in place to prevent “seepage” into the Connecticut River. The remediation process took four years, but construction of the park and community center on it could now take place.











